USPTO serial 79204907
BOTANICAL ART WAXBAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOTANICAL ART WAXBAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Scott Alprin
M. SCOTT ALPRIN ALPRIN LAW OFFICES, P.C.5 PINEHURST CIR NWWASHINGTON, DC 20015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Candle-type incenses, namely, fragrance emitting wicks for room fragrance; candle-type fragrances, namely, fragrance emitting wicks for room fragrance; candle-shaped fragrances, namely, fragrance emitting wicks for room fragrance; fragrances containing beeswax, namely, fragrance emitting wicks for room fragrance; fragrances containing soybean-derived wax, namely, fragrance emitting wicks for room fragrance; soaps and detergents; cosmetics; natural perfumery prepared from vegetables; natural perfumery prepared from animals; synthetic perfumery; blended perfumery; incenses and fragrances; food flavorings prepared from essential oils; potpourri; aromatic oil for potpourri | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Waxes being raw material; sumac wax being sumach wax; paraffin wax; beeswax for use in further manufacture; Japan wax, namely, sumac wax; soybean-derived wax for use in further manufacture; lamp wicks; candles; beeswax candles; candles containing fragrances; candles containing French fragrances; small candles; candles for illumination and wicks for the candles; candles for Christmas trees; solid lubricants for industrial purposes; fuels; mineral oils and greases for industrial purposes not for fuel; non-mineral oils and greases for industrial purposes not for fuel | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Interior objects made of wax, namely, figurines and works of art; wall hangings bearing wax, namely, wall plaques; interior objects made of wax containing fragrances, namely, figurines and works of art; wall hangings bearing wax containing fragrances, namely, wall plaques; interior-decorative objects mainly constituted of dry flowers, namely, shadow boxes containing dried flowers; interior-decorative objects mainly constituted of preserved flowers, namely, shadow boxes containing dried flowers; vase pedestals | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Artificial flowers; ribbons | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Dried flowers; flowers, natural; pressed dried flowers; live trees; grasses being live plants; wreaths of natural flowers; unprocessed nuts; fresh fruits; rough cork; unprocessed edible seaweeds; fresh vegetables other than tea leaves; unprocessed tea leaves; unprocessed sugar crops; seeds and bulbs | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Designing, other than for advertising, namely, designing of wax products, labels, seals and packages, and store design | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FUJIMURA Ryoko
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BOTANICAL ART WAXBAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 20, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |