USPTO serial 79204933
DOTD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAPLAN, VALERIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DOTD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil B. Friedman
NEIL B FRIEDMAN HODGSON RUSS LP605 THIRD AVENUESUITE 2300NEW YORK, NY 10158Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers; ales; non-alcoholic cider; low alcohol beverages, in particular beer | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2018 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2017 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |