Drawing for CITY LIGHTS

USPTO serial 79205040

CITY LIGHTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5567557Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 25, 2018
Examiner
DYER, ERIN ZASKODA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CITY LIGHTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ian Bezpalko

Ian Bezpalko The Bezpalko Law FirmP.O. Box 7635Albuquerque, NM 87194UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for playing video games, word processing, database management; computer and video games software; games software for use on any computer platform, namely, electronic entertainment and games consoles; computer game programs; video games software; computer software for computer games on the internet; game software downloadable from the internet, in particular downloadable betting games, prize games, gambling games, games of skill and casino games, all downloadable from the internet; computer software in the form of an application for mobile devices and computers for playing video games, betting and games of chance; computer software for operating casino and amusement arcade games, for operating gaming machines, slot machines or video lottery gaming machines or games of chance via the internet; gaming software that generates or displays wager outcomes of gaming machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2026INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 4, 2026INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 4, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 11, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 2, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 25, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 24, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 12, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 25, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 6, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 25, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 19, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 6, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 20, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 4, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 22, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 22, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 12, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 12, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 12, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 14, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 14, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 24, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 20, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 3, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 30, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 29, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 14, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance