USPTO serial 79205161
DUO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARKS, KIMBERLY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DUO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew J. Ladenheim
Matthew J. Ladenheim TREGO, HINES & LADENHEIM, PLLC10224 Hickorywood Hill AveSuite 202Huntersville, NC 28078Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Packaging materials; plastic materials for packaging; bags of paper or plastics for packaging; plastic bags; plastic bags for packaging; paper bags; paper bags for packaging; mailing bags; plastic mailing bags of paper or plastics for packaging; paper mailing bags; envelopes; plastic envelopes; paper envelopes; plastic film for packaging; paper sheets for packaging; tissue paper; paper wrap; plastic wrap; adhesive packaging tapes; stickers; plastic covers for packaging; plastic sacks; papers sacks; refuse sacks; paper and cardboard; printed matter; stationery; parts and fittings for the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring packaging materials, plastic materials for packaging, bags for packaging, plastic bags, plastic bags for packaging, paper bags, paper bags for packaging, mailing bags, plastic mailing bags, paper mailing bags, envelopes, plastic envelopes, paper envelopes, plastic film for packaging, paper sheets for packaging, tissue paper, paper wrap, plastic wrap, adhesive packaging tapes, stickers, plastic covers for packaging, plastic sacks, papers sacks, refuse sacks, paper and cardboard, printed matter, stationery and parts and fittings for the aforesaid; electronic retail store services featuring packaging materials, plastic materials for packaging, bags for packaging, plastic bags, plastic bags for packaging, paper bags, paper bags for packaging, mailing bags, plastic mailing bags, paper mailing bags, envelopes, plastic envelopes, paper envelopes, plastic film for packaging, paper sheets for packaging, tissue paper, paper wrap, plastic wrap, adhesive packaging tapes, stickers, plastic covers for packaging, plastic sacks, papers sacks, refuse sacks, paper and cardboard, printed matter, stationery and parts and fittings for the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |