USPTO serial 79205250
ABSOLUTE AUDIO LABS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5319611Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 31, 2017
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ABSOLUTE AUDIO LABS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E. Anthony Figg
E. Anthony Figg Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, PC901 New York Avenue, N.W.Suite 900 EastWashington, DC 20001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio apparatus, namely headphones; Software and firmware for headphones for changing the sound quality and measuring the sound output; Software applications for mobile devices to control and adjust the audio control functions in headphones; Software to control and improve audio equipment sound quality | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Absolute Audio Labs B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Absolute Audio Labs B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Absolute Audio Labs B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ABSOLUTE AUDIO LABS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 6, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 18, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |