Drawing for CÂÙ TRE

USPTO serial 79205356

CÂÙ TRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5483068Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 5, 2018
Examiner
HACK, ANDREA R
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CÂÙ TRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory F. Buhyoff

Gregory F. Buhyoff Law Office of Gregory F. Buhyoff1781 Village Center CircleSuite 120Las Vegas, NV 89134

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat; shrimp, not live; fish, not live; crab, not live; cuttlefish, not live; clams, not live; processed foods consisting of meat; processed foods consisting of fish, shrimp, crab, cuttlefish, clam; hacao (processed foods consisting of shrimp, meat); shaomai (processed foods consisting of meat); pork loaf; processed food consisting primarily of shrimp, namely, shrimp paste on sugar cane; Chinese sausagesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Tea; cakes, candy; coffee; rice; peppercorns; spring rollsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2026INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 13, 2026XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2026XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 20, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 20, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 5, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 11, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 23, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Sep 5, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 1, 2018FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Jan 12, 2018ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Dec 8, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 28, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 12, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 21, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 21, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 19, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 18, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2017SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance