USPTO serial 79205384
EKAHAU WIRELESS DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EKAHAU WIRELESS DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software; data communications apparatus and checking (supervision) apparatus; radio-frequency transmitters and receivers and radio-frequency power meters, supervision apparatus and instruments; data processing equipment and computers; telecommunication equipment; portable telecommunication equipment; computer networking and data communications equipment; portable computers; software related to handheld digital electronic devices; wireless receivers; wireless computer peripherals; computer software for use on handheld mobile digital electronic devices and other consumer electronics; software and applications for mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services relating to information technology; provision of instruction relating to computer programming; training services relating to computer systems; all the aforementioned services related to wireless telecommunications networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services; design and development of computer hardware and software; all the aforementioned services related to wireless telecommunications networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 3, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 2, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |