Drawing for CHÂTEAU LA CARDONNE

USPTO serial 79205410

CHÂTEAU LA CARDONNE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5377430Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 16, 2018
Examiner
GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with CHÂTEAU LA CARDONNE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicolas E. Seckel

Nicolas E. Seckel Seckel IP, PLLC1250 Connecticut Ave NW Ste 700Washington, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines and eaux-de-vie (brandy)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2023NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2023C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 15, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 27, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 25, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 23, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 16, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 5, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 31, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 11, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2017NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 26, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 18, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 5, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 16, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 18, 2017PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 29, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 27, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 12, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 23, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 5, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 4, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 27, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance