Drawing for ORICOBO

USPTO serial 79205421

ORICOBO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5298872Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 3, 2017
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORICOBO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third Avenue10th FloorNew York, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals used in industry; chemicals for use in the food industry; conditioning agents for food, namely, dough conditioners; chemical agents for improving the quality of bread and cake; conditioning agents for confectionery and bread; chemical agents for improving shelf life of foodstuffs; chemical agents for improving quality of foodstuffs; bacteriostats for the food industry; lye water, namely, a food preservative; lye powder, namely, Kansui, a food additive for Chinese noodles; chemical agents for softening pounded rice cakes; enzymes; lactic acid bacteria for use in food manufactureSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Yeast; fresh yeast; dry yeast; flour paste in the form of sugar confectionery and bakery creams made of wheat flour and starch as main ingredients; flour paste in powder form; custard powder; fermented flavor liquid, namely, fermented herbs; pre-fermented dough; sourdough powder; baking powder; chemical leaveners, namely, food leavening agents; mayonnaise; salad dressings; ketchup sauce; pizza sauce; yeast extract; malt extract for food; prepared brown rice; prepared sprouted rice; processed grains, namely, roasted ryeSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2025INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 24, 2025INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2025INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 20, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 19, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 3, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 17, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 3, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 18, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 28, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 3, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 2, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 29, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 28, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance