USPTO serial 79205430
SECCO MANGO MANGOCINI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5455610Status 708Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 1, 2018
- Examiner
- MALYSZEK, KIMBERLY RAY
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SECCO MANGO MANGOCINI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Peter Herres Wein- und Sektkellerei GmbH, Trier
Trier, DE
Other trademarks owned by Peter Herres Wein- und Sektkellerei GmbH, Trier
Peter Herres Wein- und Sektkellerei GmbH, Trier
DE
Other trademarks owned by Peter Herres Wein- und Sektkellerei GmbH, Trier
Peter Herres Wein- und Sektkellerei GmbH, Trier
DE
Other trademarks owned by Peter Herres Wein- und Sektkellerei GmbH, Trier
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katrin Lewertoff
Katrin Lewertoff Lewertoff IP Law Group, LLC2 Park Avenue20th FloorNew York, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | [ Mineral water; aerated water; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, refreshing fruit-based soft drinks; fruit juice beverages and fruit juices; syrups and preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit juice drinks or fruit-based soft drinks ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, except beers; champagne; sparkling wine, namely, sparkling wines made from fruit, sparkling wines made from berries, sparkling wine-based beverages, wines, light sparkling wines, wine-based beverages, prepared alcoholic cocktails and aperitifs, namely, cocktails and aperitifs made with distilled spirits or wine; spirits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Peter Herres Wein- und Sektkellerei GmbH, Trier
- Other trademarks owned by Peter Herres Wein- und Sektkellerei GmbH, Trier
- Other trademarks owned by Peter Herres Wein- und Sektkellerei GmbH, Trier
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named SECCO MANGO MANGOCINI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 4, 2025 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 4, 2024 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2024 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 4, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 13, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2017 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2017 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 9, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 6, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |