Drawing for MULAG

USPTO serial 79205435

MULAG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5724180Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 16, 2019
Examiner
FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MULAG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryan K. Wheelock

Bryan K. Wheelock HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLC7700 BONHOMMESUITE 400ST LOUIS, MO 63105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Agricultural machines, namely, mowers, power-operated tree, hedgerow, and shrub trimmers, rotary rakes, and stem crushing machines; [ harvesting machines; ] agricultural implements, namely, mowers for the immediate surroundings of street reflector posts, motorized cultivators, mulchers, power-operated stalk choppers, [ commercial and industrial vacuum cleaners, ] power-operated vegetation cutters, power-operated tree, hedgerow and shrub trimmers, and power-operated pruning shears; excavating machines; [ machine tools for removing waste and trash; ] electric cleaning machines and apparatus, namely, spray bars, high pressure washers, panel washers, and washer brushes, for tunnel walls, roadways, building walls, street reflector posts, road signs, photovoltaic panels, reflective panels for solar installations; cleaning machines and apparatus, namely, spray bars, high pressure washers, panel washers, and power washer brushes, for tunnel walls, roadways, building walls, street reflector posts, road signs, photovoltaic panels, reflective panels for solar installations; self-propelled conveyor belts, in particular for use at airportsACTIVE—
012Trailers; sprinkling trucks; industrial and airfield vehicles, in particular industrial and airfield towing vehicles for towing luggage trolleys at the airport; vehicles, namely, luggage transporters with conveyor belts for transporting luggage at airports; vehicles, namely, containers transporters for transporting containers at airportsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2026INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 9, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 5, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 9, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 15, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 8, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 8, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jul 16, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 1, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 9, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2019NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 20, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 20, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 20, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 31, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 12, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 26, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 30, 2018RDX2ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED—
Jul 30, 2018RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jun 11, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 31, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 31, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 30, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 30, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 2, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 2, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 28, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance