USPTO serial 79205871
EXOLIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5403940Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 20, 2018
- Examiner
- ROSENBLATT, ANNA
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with EXOLIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH
65926 Frankfurt am Main, DE
Other trademarks owned by Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH
Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH
65926 Frankfurt am Main, DE
Other trademarks owned by Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH
Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH
65926 Frankfurt am Main, DE
Other trademarks owned by Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Devasena Reddy
Devasena Reddy HM LAW GROUP LLP5655 Silver Creek Valley Road,, #850San Jose, CA 95138UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals for the flame-proofing or flame-resistance treatment of materials such as wood, textiles, paper, cardboard, artificial resin-based materials, iron and other metals as well as concrete | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named EXOLIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2024 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2024 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 20, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 8, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 22, 2017 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 5, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 3, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |