CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ROTKÄPPCHEN FRUITSECCO SEIT 1856

USPTO serial 79206104

ROTKÄPPCHEN FRUITSECCO SEIT 1856

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5337663Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 21, 2017
Examiner
BAGLINI, KAREN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROTKÄPPCHEN FRUITSECCO SEIT 1856?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin J. Beran

Martin J. Beran Ostrolenk Faber LLP845 Third Avenue8th FloorNew York, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032beers; mineral waters; aerated waters; de-alcoholized beverages, namely, de-alcoholized wine; fruit beverages; fruit juices; syrups for making beverages; preparations for making beverages, namely, syrupsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
033alcoholic beverages except beerSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2025INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 27, 2025XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 27, 2025XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 7, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 7, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 21, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 2, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 21, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 5, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 16, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 24, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 3, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 9, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 8, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 1, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 1, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance