USPTO serial 79206161
CORK UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CORK UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terrence J. McAllister
Terrence J. McAllister OHLANDT, GREELEY, RUGGIERO & PERLE, LLPONE LANDMARK SQUARE10TH FLOORSTAMFORD, CT 06901-2682Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing live and on-line courses at the university level, post-graduate, professional and executive level covering instruction, classes, seminars, and conferences in the field of business and subjects relating to business; arrangement, conducting and organization of exhibition events and conferences in the fields of business education; publications of books and textbooks for business education; electronic publication of newsletters, brochures and periodicals in the fields of education and training; educational services, namely, providing information in the fields of teaching at the university level; organization of academic competitions; providing cultural facilities in the nature of performing arts theater facilities; Providing information in the fields of business education; arranging and conducting of seminars, workshops and symposiums in the fields of business education; teaching and practical training in the field of business; theatre productions; information relating to entertainment and cultural activities; education, instruction and training provided on-line from a computer database or from facilities provided on the Internet and other similar information networks in the fields of business education; organization, production and presentation of on-line training and education provided on-line from a computer database or from facilities provided on the Internet and other similar information networks in the fields of business education and training; publishing services; advisory, consultancy and information services relating to the aforesaid educational and entertainment services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 10, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 7, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |