USPTO serial 79206339
IO CHEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5430453Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 27, 2018
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IO CHEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
I-70044 POLIGNANO A MARE (BA), IT
I-70044 POLIGNANO A MARE (BA), IT
I-70044 POLIGNANO A MARE (BA), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
John S. Egbert Egbert Law Offices, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Frozen meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2025 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 11, 2025 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 11, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 27, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 27, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 9, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 9, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |