USPTO serial 79206371
ISABEL MARANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, REBECCA ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ISABEL MARANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R Peter Spies
R PETER SPIES DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED160 N WACKER DRIVECHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumes; Eaux de toilette; Skin soaps; Toilet soaps; Cosmetics products, namely, eye shadows, blush, blush-pencils, and make-up sets; Skin lotions; Non-medicated salts, oils and gels for bathing, shaving and toilet purposes; Essential oils; Make-up powder; Make-up; Nail varnish; Lipstick; Non-medicated hair lotions; Hair sprays; Shampoos; Dentifrices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 9, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |