USPTO serial 79206516
MIMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5567566Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2018
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MIMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles T.J. Weigell
Charles T.J. Weigell Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 West 42nd Street, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | measuring apparatus and instruments for measuring acoustic signals, namely audiometer; measuring devices, electric for measuring acoustic signals, namely audiometer; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound; electronic devices, namely digital sound processors, for processing, modification, transmission, reception and modulation of sounds and audio content; amplifiers; audio receivers; diagnostic apparatus for testing user's hearing to create individualized hearing profiles for optimizing the user's experience of listening to audio content, not for medical purposes; computer software applications, downloadable, for measuring user data to create individualized hearing profiles for optimizing the user's experience of listening to audio content; computer programs for measuring user data to create individualized listening profiles for optimizing the user's experience of listening to audio content; downloadable mobile applications for processing, modification, transmission, reception and modulation of sounds and audio content for optimizing the user's experience of hearing to music and audio content; downloadable mobile applications for measuring user data to create individualized hearing profiles for optimizing the user's experience of listening to audio content; downloadable mobile applications for the administration and interpretation of hearing tests, and for storing hearing test results to create and save individualized hearing profiles for optimizing the user's experience of listening to audio content; data files, information files, sound files and video files for optimizing the user's experience of listening to audio content, all being downloadable from the internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mimi Hearing Technologies GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Mimi Hearing Technologies GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Mimi Hearing Technologies GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MIMI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2025 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2025 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 26, 2024 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 25, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 10, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 16, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |