USPTO serial 79206733
ECOWIFI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECOWIFI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunication networks; telecommunication apparatus; transmitters telecommunication; telecommunication apparatus; telecommunication apparatus; portable telecommunication apparatus; portable telecommunication apparatus; printed circuit units for telecommunications; computer hardware for telecommunications; wireless transmitters; wireless communication devices; wireless broadband radios; wireless computer peripherals; wireless telephony apparatus; wireless computer mice; masts for wireless aerials; two-way wireless communications systems; wireless high frequency transmission instruments; network cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation of telecommunication equipment and wireless local area networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications; radio telecommunications; interactive telecommunication services; telecommunication access services; telecommunications gateway services; operation of telecommunication systems; operation of telecommunications apparatus; telecommunication services on digital networks; telecommunications routing and junction services; operation of broadband telecommunication networks; telecommunication services, namely, personal communication services; provision of telecommunication connections to a global computer network; provision of telecommunication connections to a global computer network; provision of access to databases and to the Internet via telecommunications; facilitation of telecommunications connections to a global computer network or to databases; wireless communication services; wireless communication services; wireless digital messaging services; rental of wireless communication systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 19, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 12, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |