USPTO serial 79206745
CLARINS HYDRA-ESSENTIEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5393507Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 6, 2018
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CLARINS HYDRA-ESSENTIEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Catherine Merz
Mary Catherine Merz Merz & Associates, P.C.408 Madison Street, Suite AOak Park, IL 60302UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Beauty products for different parts of the human body, face, eyes, neck, bust, body, hands, feet, in particular beauty creams, beauty serums, beauty milks, beauty lotions, tonic lotions, beauty masks, beauty gels, beauty oils, refreshing spray for the skin, these excluding all products based on essential oils | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2023 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2023 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 3, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 6, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 21, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 9, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 19, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 12, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |