Drawing for SMARTLINE

USPTO serial 79206807

SMARTLINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 405
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DICKSON, RACHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTLINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Lebow

Mark Lebow Ladas & Parry1700 Diagonal RoadSuite 505Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines and machine tools for material processing and production, namely, machine tools for cutting, grinding, drilling, milling and forming of materials; tools as parts of machines namely, metal-, plastics- and woodworking machines tools; motor-driven tools, namely, power tools in the nature of cutters, grinders, drills, and millers; electrical tools, namely, electric cutters, electric grinders, electric drills, and electric millersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Software, including downloadable applications for smartphones and tablet computers, all for controlling, monitoring, simulating and visualizing of machines, machine parts, machine functions and processes; hardware, namely, computer hardware, for controlling, monitoring, simulating and visualizing of machines, machine parts, machine functions and processesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Development, preparation, programming and installation of software, and downloadable and we-based applications, for smartphones and tablet computers, all for controlling, monitoring, simulating and visualizing machines, machine parts, machine functions and processes, the aforesaid services in particular relating to machine toolsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2018TRPTREQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION PROCESSED - TOTAL—
Sep 24, 2018ERFTTEAS REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 8, 2018GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Aug 8, 2018GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Aug 8, 2018CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Jul 30, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 30, 2018PGOAPETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION—
Jul 25, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 10, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 9, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 20, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 13, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 12, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 11, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 9, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 5, 2017LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 4, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance