Drawing for SOLO

USPTO serial 79206861

SOLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
INGRAM, KYLE G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Paper, cardboard and goods made from these materials, not included in other classes; paper, cardboard, towels of paper, face towels of paper, napkins of paper, toilet paper, handkerchiefs of paper, baby bibs of paper, table cloths of paper, table mats of paper, wrapping and packaging materials of paper, cardboard and plastic materials, sacks of paper, bags of paper, garbage bags of paper or of plasticsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 8, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 8, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 14, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 14, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2018CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Apr 6, 2018CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 18, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 16, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 14, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 17, 2017LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 8, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 26, 2017LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jun 17, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 16, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 9, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 8, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 9, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 4, 2017SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance