Drawing for DKE VDE DIN ONLINE STANDARDIZATION

USPTO serial 79206912

DKE VDE DIN ONLINE STANDARDIZATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5450569Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 24, 2018
Examiner
CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DKE VDE DIN ONLINE STANDARDIZATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan D. Pitchford

Susan D. Pitchford Chernoff Vilhauer LLP111 SW Columbia StreetSuite 725Portland, OR 97201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Data processors and data processing programs recorded on data carriers; computer software for data processingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
038Telecommunications, in particular transmission of information about standardization in the fields of electricity, electronics, electrical engineering and information technology by means of telecommunications networks; providing access to platforms and portals on the InternetSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Education services, namely, training, conducting of seminars and congresses in the field of standardization; publication of standards in the field of electricity, electronics, electrical engineering and information technologySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific research and development in the area of electrical engineering, electronics, medical technology, information technology, microelectronics and micro-technologies, namely, technical and scientific support for standardization, quality management, ergonomics and software security, information and communications technology; development of technical standards for electrical engineering; examination, testing, monitoring and certification in the field of product quality, in particular in relation to compliance with standards, laws and regulations; [ hosting, developing and maintaining of databases and ] [ hosting, developing and maintaining of websites; ] * operation of a database (development and maintenance of databases), operation of an information system (development and maintenance of an information system) on the world wide web; * testing and certification of tests and checks on electrical engineering, electronics and information technology devices and installations; testing, analysis, and evaluation in the fields of electrical engineering, electronics and information technology to determine conformity with certification standards; engineering, physics, chemistry and information technology servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 19, 2026INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 31, 2025XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 31, 2025XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jul 8, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 14, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 24, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2019INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 19, 2018COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Dec 19, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 19, 2018LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 25, 2018LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 9, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jul 24, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 21, 2018ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Feb 8, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 9, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 25, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 4, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 30, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 2, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 19, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 18, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 12, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 11, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance