USPTO serial 79207091
CHOCO CHIMBO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHOCO CHIMBO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee flavorings; high-protein cereal bars; sponge cakes; buns; bread rolls; waffles; malt biscuits; cake frosting icing; rice-based snack food; cereal-based snack food; fruit jellies confectionery; confectionery for decorating Christmas trees; cakes; pastries; peanut confectionery; almond confectionery; frozen yogurt confectionery ices; cocoa; caramels candy; sweetmeats candy; liquorice confectionery; peppermint sweets; coffee; unroasted coffee; crackers; macaroons pastry; marzipan; ice cream; dessert mousses confectionery; chocolate mousses; muesli; mint for confectionery; cocoa-based beverages; coffee-based beverages containing milk; coffee-based beverages; chocolate beverages with milk; tea-based beverages; chocolate-based beverages; stick liquorice confectionery; pastilles confectionery; cookies; petit-beurre biscuits; pies; fondants confectionery; popcorn; petits fours cakes; pralines; gingerbread; cake powder; fruit coulis sauces; bubble gum confectionery; chewing gum; confectionery; nougat; chocolate paste; sherbets ices; rusks; breadcrumbs; sandwiches; tabbouleh; tacos; tarts; almond paste; tortillas; halvah; bread; unleavened bread; chips cereal products; corn flakes; oat flakes; chicory coffee substitute; tea; iced tea; cheeseburgers sandwiches; chocolate | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 30, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |