Drawing for KYOEI KK

USPTO serial 79207417

KYOEI KK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5352734Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 12, 2017
Examiner
GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with KYOEI KK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

OMAR SIDDIQUI

OMAR SIDDIQUI SIDDIQUI LAW, A Professional Corporation695 Town Center DriveSuite 230Costa Mesa, CA 92626

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Golf clubs; golf balls; golf bags; golf gloves; golf shoes; golf ball markers; golf tees; golf divot repair toolsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 9, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 12, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2019DCPNCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 27, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 12, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 26, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2017CRSNCORRECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 6, 2017CRCRCORRECTION CREATED FOR IB—
Sep 6, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 25, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 23, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 22, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 11, 2017LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 11, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance