Drawing for A

USPTO serial 79207444

A

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATTS-FITZGERALD, CAITLIN C
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with A?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ian L. Saffer

IAN L SAFFER ADSERO IP8210 SOUTHPARK TERRACELITTLETON, CO 80120UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for intranet and Internet based collaboration; downloadable application software for cloud computing for storing, importing, exporting, mapping, consolidating and integrating data for use in the field of secure product life cycle management data and database collaborationABANDONED—
035Updating and viewing computer data via an on-line service, namely, computer data entry services, mapping, systematization and consolidation of data in computer databases, updating and maintenance of data in computer databases; product data collaboration services, namely, providing a computer-based website for users to share data and databases; providing a searchable internet database of business data and commercial product life cycle data for Internet based collaborationABANDONED—
042Consultancy in the field of computer software for Internet and intranet; installation and maintenance of computer software; computer programming services; development of computer software; rental and leasing of computer software; cloud computing services, namely, providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable operating software for accessing and using a cloud computing network; on-line services for collaboration over the Internet, namely, electronic storage of data and documentsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2020DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 8, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 1, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 9, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 9, 2019MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 9, 2019ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 9, 2019OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 9, 2019OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 5, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 29, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 25, 2018OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2018OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Oct 17, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 23, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 6, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 6, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 17, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 17, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 17, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 22, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 22, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 22, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 19, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 16, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 15, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 11, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance