Drawing for DAIICHIDENSOBUHIN CO., LTD.

USPTO serial 79207532

DAIICHIDENSOBUHIN CO., LTD.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHWAB, MATTHEW DAVID
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAIICHIDENSOBUHIN CO., LTD.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Power distribution or control machines and apparatus; rotary converters; phase modifiers; electronic machines, apparatus and their parts; fire enginesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Electric lamps and other lighting apparatusSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
012Automobiles and their parts and fittings; two-wheeled motor vehicles, bicycles and their parts and fittingsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 30, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 31, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 17, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 29, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 25, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 19, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 19, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 18, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 11, 2017SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance