Drawing for AERTEC SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 79207573

AERTEC SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5455664Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 1, 2018
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AERTEC SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald C. Lucas

Donald C. Lucas Lucas & Mercanti, LLP30 Broad Street21st FloorNew York, NY 10004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Simulators for operation of aircraft; simulators for operation of weapons; simulators for the steering and control of vehicles; remote controls for Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS); software controllers for Remotely Piloted Aircarft Systems (RPAS)SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
012Space vehicles and aerial vehicles in the nature of remotely piloted aircraft; structural parts of space vehicles and air vehicles in the nature of remotely piloted aircraft; unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) for civilian as well as military useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Construction of airports; shipbuilding; construction of buildingsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Engineering specialized in Airports and Aerospace Industry; engineering research for airports and Aerospace Industry; engineering consultancy for Airports and Aerospace Industry; quality control for Airports and Aerospace Industry, industrial design for Aerospace Industry; development of software for secure network operations for Airports and Aerospace IndustrySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2026INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 3, 2026INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 15, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 15, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 1, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 13, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 1, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 13, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 3, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 12, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 30, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 29, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 22, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 18, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance