Drawing for CERERÍA MOLLÁ SINCE 1899

USPTO serial 79207582

CERERÍA MOLLÁ SINCE 1899

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5735923Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 30, 2019
Examiner
EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CERERÍA MOLLÁ SINCE 1899?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Handelsman

Jeffrey H. Handelsman Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumes; liquid perfumes; natural perfumery; eau de parfum; aromas for perfumes; perfumes for automobiles; oils for perfumes and scents; perfumery and fragrances; vanilla perfumery; perfumes, natural oils for perfumes; perfume body sprays; perfumes for rooms in spray formACTIVE—
004Floating candles; perfumed candles; scented candles; candles used for lighting; votive candles; tallow candles; tealights candles; table candles; candles in tins; candle sets comprised of candles; wicks for candles; candles for lighting; candles and candle wicks for lighting; candles for night lighting; candles for special occasions; candles for Christmas; wax for making candles; fragrance candles for aromatherapy; candles for absorbing smoke; candles containing insect repellents; beeswax for use in the manufacture of candles; candles for use as nightlightsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 6, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2026EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 23, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2026ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jul 23, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 23, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 28, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 29, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2022CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jun 21, 2022CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 25, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 22, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 30, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 11, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2019PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 4, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 24, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 12, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 8, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 1, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 12, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 31, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 30, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 22, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 18, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance