Drawing for DESIGN LED

USPTO serial 79207634

DESIGN LED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DESIGN LED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Lighting apparatus and installations; lighting apparatus and devices for automobiles; light-emitting diodes LED lights; light emitting diode lights for automobiles; street lamps; safety lamps for underground use; germicidal lamps for purifying air; neon lamps; lanterns; dynamo lamps; fittings for discharge lamps; incandescent lamps; incandescent lamp fittings; ultraviolet ray lamps, not for medical purposes; germicidal lamps; chandeliers; water surface lamps; mercury lamps; aquarium lights; spotlights; arc lamps; safety lamps; diving lights; decoration lamps; infrared lamps; torches for lighting; fish gathering lamp; ceiling lights; fairy lights for festive decoration; electric lights for Christmas trees; standard lamps; searchlights; artificial solar lamp; floodlights; fluorescent lamps; flashlights torches; lights for motorcycles; automobile lights; reflectors for automobiles; lamps for directional signals of automobiles; electric bulbs for directional signals of automobiles; fluorescent lamp tubes; miniature light bulb; filaments for electric lamps; sockets for electric lights; headlights for automobiles; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 16, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 24, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 16, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 24, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 7, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 26, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 26, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 25, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 18, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance