Drawing for DERMOSAFE

USPTO serial 79207702

DERMOSAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5435478Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 3, 2018
Examiner
LATTUCA, FRANK J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DERMOSAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Baker

Stephen L. Baker Baker and Rannells PA92 East Main StreetSuite 302Somerville, NJ 08876

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instruments, namely, apparatus for medical diagnostic testing in the fields of cancer or other tissue-based diagnostic testing, cytology and cell-based testing; diagnostic apparatus for medical use, namely medical diagnostic apparatus for detecting cancer; testing apparatus for medical use, namely medical testing apparatus for detecting cancer; medical imaging apparatusSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
044Medical services; telemedicine services; medical surgical services, namely surgery; medical diagnostics, diagnostics in the field of medicine, namely detecting cancer; medical evaluation services, namely evaluation of cancer; provision of medical information; medical testing services relating to disease diagnosis and treatment; medical services for the treatment of skin cancer; medical analysis services for cancer diagnosis; medical analysis services related to the treatment of individuals; medical imaging servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2025INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 13, 2025INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2025INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 18, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 18, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 3, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 3, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 3, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 16, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 27, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 27, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 1, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 7, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 27, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 25, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 24, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 18, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance