Drawing for YFCF

USPTO serial 79207881

YFCF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5516002Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 17, 2018
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YFCF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Containers for household or kitchen use; beverage glassware for daily use; cups, plates and jugs made of glass for daily use; urns made of glass; ceramics for household purposes, namely, ceramic vases, vessels, bowls, plates and pots; porcelain ware, namely, porcelain mugs, vases, vessels, bowls, plates and pots; pottery, namely, pottery bowls, vases, vessels, bowls, plates and pots; porcelain ware for daily use, namely, basins in the nature of bowls, bowls, plates, jugs, coffee services in the nature of tableware; urns; demijohns and pots; china ornaments; works of art of porcelain, ceramic, earthenware or glass; tea services in the nature of tableware; liqueur sets comprised of decanters and glass beveragewareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2026INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 27, 2026XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2026XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Sep 30, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 31, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 21, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 30, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 17, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 1, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 27, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 11, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2018NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 29, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 26, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Feb 25, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 29, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 24, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 8, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 30, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 27, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 26, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 18, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance