Drawing for VITRABOND

USPTO serial 79207889

VITRABOND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DICKSON, RACHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VITRABOND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Cladding of metal for facades; facade construction components of metal; facade elements of metal; facade facings of metal; facades of metal; frames of metal for curtain wall facades; metal double skinned heat insulated facade constructions; metallic building facade elements; metallic facade elements for buildings; plates of metal for building facades; wall facades of metal; window facades of metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 19, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 24, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 1, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 16, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 24, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 16, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 8, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 8, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 7, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 25, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 18, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance