Drawing for INOCON

USPTO serial 79208137

INOCON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 401
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ATTANG, UDEME U
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INOCON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Colleen M. Raimond

Colleen M. Raimond Nixon Peabody LLP1300 Clinton SquareRochester, NY 14604-1792UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Hard material coatings of diamonds, nitrides, carbides or oxides applied by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and by physical vapor deposition (PVD) for the manufacture of cutting surfaces on machining tools, separating tools and forming toolsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
007Coated machine tools, in particular cutting tools, separating tools and forming toolsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
008Manually hand operated tools, in particular cutting tools, separating tools and forming tools, in particular coated toolsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
040Material treatment, namely, coating of tools and work pieces with functional layers, by using PVD/CVD coating machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 26, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 26, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 26, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 16, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 16, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 6, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 5, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 26, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 26, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 25, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance