USPTO serial 79208355
DENYALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DENYALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for recording, transmission, reproduction of sound and images; information processing apparatus; software (recorded programs); software for securing Internet sites | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications; communications by fiber-optic networks; communications by computer terminals; rental of message sending apparatus; electronic messaging; emails; message transmission; computer-assisted transmission of messages and images; electronic display services; connection by telecommunications to a national or international computer network; routing and junction services for telecommunications; provision of access to databases; provision of access to a national or international computer network; electronic bulletin board services (telecommunications); telecommunication information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical studies for computer software; adaptation, updating and rental of computer software; design and development of computers, software and computer systems; computer and software consultancy; creation and maintenance of Web sites for others; duplication of computer programs; hosting of Internet sites; rental of computer software, of Web servers and computers; maintenance of computer software; recovery of computer data; computer virus protection services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 31, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |