USPTO serial 79208396
POLLINATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POLLINATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Apparatuses and machines for extracting and crystalizing of materials using vegetable matter; sieves and filters for the aforementioned apparatuses and machines; filtering machines; parts for the aforesaid products, not included in other classes | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Filters for home or industrial installations, in particular for extracting and crystalizing of materials from vegetable material; parts for the aforesaid products, not included in other classes | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising and publicity; advertising and sales promotion services; dissemination of advertisements and promotional material, also via internet, in the field of apparatus, machines, sieves and filters for extracting and crystalizing materials using vegetable matter; promotion of apparatus, machines, sieves and filters for extracting and crystalizing materials using vegetable matter; business mediation in purchase, sale, import and export of apparatus, machines, sieves and filters for extracting and crystalizing materials using vegetable matter; organisation of fairs and exhibition for commercial and/ or advertising purposes; commercial information; public relation services; the conducting of advertising campaign involving fairs, exhibitions and congresses; merchandising services; business management; business administration; office functions; aforementioned services can be rendered via internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |