Drawing for CUSCO PROGRESSIVE EQUIPMENT

USPTO serial 79208590

CUSCO PROGRESSIVE EQUIPMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5332243Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 14, 2017
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with CUSCO PROGRESSIVE EQUIPMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn E. Smith

Kathryn E. Smith Wood Herron & Evans LLP600 Vine StreetSuite 2800Cincinnati, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Non-electric prime movers for land vehicles, not including their parts, namely, internal combustion engines, gasoline engines, diesel engines, motors for land vehicles and engines for land vehicles; shock absorbers for vehicles; vehicle suspension systems for land vehicles comprising vehicle suspension springs and suspension shock absorbers; suspension parts for land vehicles, namely, coil springs, equalizers, torsion/sway bars; hydraulic height control machines for land vehicles; transmission shafts for land vehicles; shaft couplings for land vehicles; [ axle bearings for land vehicles; ] transmissions for land vehicles; [ suspension springs for vehicles; ] brakes for vehicles; mechanical elements for land vehicles, namely, transmission mechanisms for land vehicles; [ anti-theft alarms for vehicles; electric motors for land vehicles; automobiles; ] structural parts for automobiles [ ; two-wheeled motorized vehicles; structural parts for two-wheeled motorized vehicles; patches for repairing inner tubes ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 8, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 3, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 27, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 15, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 14, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 29, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 18, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 10, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 9, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 2, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance