Drawing for OCTO

USPTO serial 79208926

OCTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OCTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Springs (metal hardware) used in the manufacture of mattresses and sofas (not including machine elements); non-electric wires of common metals used in automotive; furniture industries (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations); metal profiles made of steel and common metals; tubes of metal used in manufacture of furnitureSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 1, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 17, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 7, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 17, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 19, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 12, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 11, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 6, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2017LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance