Drawing for SCARLETT

USPTO serial 79208977

SCARLETT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCARLETT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joel R. Leeman

Joel R. Leeman Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP125 Summer StreetBoston, MA 02110-1618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Musical instrument digital interface controllers, converters and software; microphone pre-amplifiers; stereo pre-amplifiers; outboard audio processing equipment; computer network interface devices for transmitting and recording audio; audio interfaces to record music and audio to a computer; downloadable electronic publications in relation to audio and audio equipment; sound recording control boards; MIDI controllers other than musical instruments; containers and bags adapted for use with all of the aforesaid goods; parts, fittings and accessories for all the aforesaid goods; none of the aforesaid being incorporated into digital still and motion cameras and none of the aforesaid being for the creation, storage, delivery, manipulation, recording, playback or viewing of still or moving imagesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 27, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2021FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 28, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 31, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 13, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 7, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 11, 2018ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 10, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2018CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 8, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 20, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 13, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 13, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 12, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2017LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance