USPTO serial 79209053
IM INOX MECCANICA TECHNOLOGY FOR THE FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5366990Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 2, 2018
- Examiner
- PAINTER, VALERIYA SHERMAN
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with IM INOX MECCANICA TECHNOLOGY FOR THE FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alison M. Caless
Alison M. Caless Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church StreetFloor 22Hartford, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Industrial washing machines for cleaning meats; electric industrial washing machines for the food industry; steam cleaning machines; machines for packaging food; vacuum packing machines; tying machines for processing meat products; semiautomatic tying machines for processing meat products; automatic tying machines for processing cold cuts; heat sealing machine for industrial purposes; vacuum packaging machines; power-operated basket presses; feeding machines for presses for industrial use; industrial machine presses for shaping meat and cold cuts; industrial shaping machines for processing meat products; pressure washing machines; sausage making machines; fleshing machines used in the food processing industry; cutters, being machines for processing meats; sausage stuffers, electric; meat stuffing machines; meat processing machines; food blenders, electric; machines, namely, workpiece loaders; automatic loaders for gut or mesh; electric tumbler machines for marinating cold cuts; automatic vacuum salters for processing cold cuts; loading machines for tumblers for processing meat and cold cuts; cutting machines, namely, meat tenderizers for the food processing industry; semi-automatic clipping machines for processing meat products; automatic clipping machines for processing meat products; all of the foregoing being made in substantial part of stainless steel | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INOX MECCANICA S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by INOX MECCANICA-S.R.L
- Other trademarks owned by INOX MECCANICA-S.R.L
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named IM INOX MECCANICA TECHNOLOGY FOR THE FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2024 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2024 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 27, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 21, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |