USPTO serial 79209061
BOOST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5455727Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 1, 2018
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with BOOST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Lyhus
John E. Lyhus Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP120 S. LaSalle StreetSuite 2100Chicago, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for the design and computer-aided manufacturing of workpieces used in sheet metal processing; software for programming and production control of machines for sheet metal material treatment; software for programming and production control of machine tools for sheet metal material treatment; software for programming and production control of machine tools for sheet metal working; all the aforementioned goods being not for paper or non-woven textile processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer-aided remote monitoring of machines and machine tools for quality control, technical supervision and inspection purposes; computer-aided remote control and remote monitoring of machines for material treatment for quality control, technical supervision and inspection purposes; computer-aided remote control and remote monitoring of machine tools for sheet metal material treatment for quality control, technical supervision and inspection purposes; computer-aided remote control and remote monitoring of machine tools for sheet metal working for quality control, technical supervision and inspection purposes; development, creation, installation, maintenance and updating of software for the design and for computer-aided manufacturing of workpieces used in sheet metal processing; development, creation, installation, maintenance and updating of software for programming and production control of machines for sheet metal material treatment; development, creation, installation, maintenance and updating of software for programming and production control of machine tools for material treatment; development, creation, installation, maintenance and updating of software for programming and production control of machine tools for sheet metal working; all the aforementioned services being not for paper or non-woven textile processing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TRUMPF GmbH + Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by TRUMPF GmbH + Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by TRUMPF SE + Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BOOST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2024 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2024 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 23, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 29, 2024 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 13, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 1, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |