USPTO serial 79209326
GEMMOTORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GEMMOTORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine tools for vehicles, motors and engines other than for land vehicles, namely; current generators; power generators other than for land vehicles; wind-powered electricity generators; electricity generators using solar cells; electric power generators for ships; electric power supply units being generators; generators, namely DC generators, welding generators; current generators; alternating current generators; gas-operated power generators; steam-operated power generators; direct-current generators; inert-gas generators being machines; AC generators being alternators; emergency power supply generators; generators for land vehicles; generators for wind turbines; power installations being steam-operated, gas-operated generators; high voltage generators; mobile electricity generators; electric motors, other than for land vehicles; emergency power generators; engines and motors other than for land vehicles; motors, other than for land vehicles; aeroplane engines; motors for boats; engines for air cushion vehicles; aeronautical engines; electric motors and parts therefore, not for land vehicles; electric motors other than for land vehicles; electric motors for machines; electric motors for machines with digital servo drive control; electric driving motors for machines; electric starter motors; emission reduction units for motors and engines; drives for alternating current servo motors; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Vehicles, namely cars, motorbikes, bicycles, motorcycles; apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water, namely, cars, motorbikes, bicycles, motorcycles electric motors with permanent magnets for land vehicles; electric motors for land vehicles with permanent magnets which allow the motors to be fitted in a compact and integrated manner in vehicle wheels; electric motors for electric vehicles, namely cars, motorbikes, bicycles, motorcycles; environmentally friendly electromagnetic actuators for electric vehicles, namely cars, motorbikes, bicycles, motorcycles; electric motors for land vehicles; hybrid electric vehicles in the nature of cars; motors, electric, for land vehicles; motors for cycles, namely, motorcycles; motors for land vehicles; automobile engines; geared electric motors for land vehicles; electric motors for wheelchairs; electric motors for motor cars; transmission components, namely, motors and engines for land vehicles; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |