USPTO serial 79209648
FUTURE COFFEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUTURE COFFEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee, coffee-based beverages, coffee extracts, coffee substitutes, tea, herbal tea infusions, tea-based beverages, tea substitutes; cocoa, cocoa-based beverages, chocolate, chocolate extracts in powder, granulated or liquid form, drinking chocolate, drinking chocolate mix; sugar; preparations made from cereals, pastry, confectionery, pastries, cakes, biscuits, crackers, crispbread, bread, bread sticks; ices, ice cream, ice cream products, frozen confections, frozen yoghurt; chilled desserts, chocolate desserts, dessert mousses, sorbets; snack food products consisting of cereal products, rice, pasta, noodles and couscous; cereals and cereal preparations; flavoured fillings for confectionery and pastry; sweet spreads, honey, treacle, maple syrup; yeast extracts as spreads, yeast extract spreads, mustards, relishes; sauces, ketchup, tomato sauce, soy sauce, chilli sauce, oyster sauce; simmer sauces; stir fry sauces; sauces in a pouch; cooking sauces; pizza, pizza bases; sauces; sauces for pasta and rice; salad dressing; mayonnaise; spices; seasonings, marinades, condiments; dessert toppings; salsa; yeast, baking-powder; salt, vinegar | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Services for providing food and drink including cafes, coffee shops and restaurants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |