Drawing for WDS

USPTO serial 79209730

WDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5362143Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 26, 2017
Examiner
MARTINS, ODETTE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Pandiscio

Mark J. Pandiscio Pandiscio & Pandiscio436 Boston Post RoadWeston, MA 02493UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007clamping devices, in particular zero point clamping devices for or on machine tools for holding workpieces during machining; clamping machines for use in the precision clamping of work pieces, power chucks, steady rests, expanders, fixed or oscillating clamping bolts, double clamping bolts, grid plates being parts of machines, in particular for fastening clamping devices; flanges being clamping cams; all the aforesaid goods being modular and being parts of machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2025INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 6, 2025INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2025INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 12, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 12, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 29, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 25, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 6, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 26, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 26, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 21, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 10, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 21, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance