Drawing for ADIAMAS

USPTO serial 79210066

ADIAMAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5836712Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 20, 2019
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADIAMAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David D. Rodrigues

David D. Rodrigues Gottlieb, Rackman & Reisman P.C.270 Madison Ave, 8th FloorNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine tools, namely, cutting and slicing tools for machines for household or industrial use for use in the culinary and food preparation fieldsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
008non-electric cutlery; table forks; spoons; razorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Non-electric household and kitchen utensils and containers not of precious metal and not coated with precious metal, namely, non-electric containers for household or kitchen use not of precious metal, spatulas, whisks, rolling pins, graters, pouring and straining spouts, wood chopping blocks, kitchen tongs, sieves, colanders, crushers for kitchen use; kitchen scoops in the nature of ice cream scoops, ice scoops, tart scoops, serving scoops for flour, sugar, ice cream, rice, and coffee; spatulas for kitchen useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2026INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 9, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 20, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 12, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 20, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 20, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 1, 2019IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Jun 18, 2019IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Jun 14, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 4, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 15, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 26, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 22, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 22, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2018ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 20, 2018PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 3, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 1, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 14, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 24, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 24, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 23, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 19, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance