Drawing for SCINOMED

USPTO serial 79210238

SCINOMED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAGLIARDI, JEANINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCINOMED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James L. Scott

JAMES L SCOTT WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD LLP900 FIFTH THIRD CENTER111 LYON STREET NWGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Blood collection apparatus; blood testing apparatus and instruments; blood separation apparatus; plasma collection apparatus; plasma testing apparatus and instruments; plasma separation apparatus; automated plasma collection apparatus; blood and plasma collection bags for medical purposes; medical tubing for drainage, transfusion, phlebotomy, blood removal, plasma removal, blood testing, plasma testing and plasma separation; tubing for use in medical apparatus for blood and/or plasma collection and treatment; basins for medical purposes; centrifugal bowls for medical purposes, namely, blood processing; parts, fittings and accessories for all of the aforesaid goods, namely, apparatus for taking blood and plasma, capillary tubes for blood, hematimeters, blood and plasma collection bags for medical purposes and connective tubing for use in blood and plasma collection and testing kitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 29, 2020IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Apr 28, 2020IRFIIRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 16, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 1, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 15, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 13, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 13, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 22, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 15, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 15, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 6, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 28, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 15, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 5, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 3, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 3, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 3, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 3, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 5, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 8, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 8, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 29, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 28, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 23, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance