Drawing for SCINOMED BLOOD PROCESSING SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 79210239

SCINOMED BLOOD PROCESSING SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5893585Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 29, 2019
Examiner
GAGLIARDI, JEANINE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCINOMED BLOOD PROCESSING SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James L. Scott

JAMES L SCOTT WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD LLP111 LYON STREET NW 900 FIFTH THIRD CENTERGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Medical services; medical advisory services; medical advisory services in relation to medical apparatus and instruments; consultancy services for the medical industry, namely, consultancy services in the field of medical care; consultancy services in relation to the collection and processing of blood for medical purposes; information services in relation to all of the aforesaidSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 21, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 13, 2021FINPFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 27, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 29, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 29, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 23, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 13, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 27, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 26, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 5, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 15, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 6, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 16, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 6, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 5, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2018DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 3, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 3, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 3, 2018ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 3, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 5, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 8, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 8, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 29, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 28, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 23, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance