Drawing for MENES

USPTO serial 79210499

MENES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5505366Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 3, 2018
Examiner
FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MENES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sarah M. Stemer

Sarah M. Stemer Lerner Greenberg Stemer LLPPO Box 2480Hollywood, FL 33022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Bakery machines, namely, bread cutting machines; pasta making machines; dough processing machines, namely, dough kneading machines for household purposes; biscuit making machines; confectionery making machines; bench presses in the nature of electric fruit presses; kneading machines for making pasta for household purposes; electric dough kneading machines for household purposes; electric dough dividing machines; electric dough rounding machines; electric pasta cutting machines; roller tracks for use in belt conveyor apparatus; belt conveyors; machines for cutting strip material; machines for shaping pasta; dough shaping machines; electric shaping machines for pasta; dough sheeting and kneading machinery for household purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2026INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 4, 2026INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 4, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 17, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 17, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 3, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 10, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 3, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 17, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2018PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 9, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 5, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 8, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 30, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 30, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 29, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance