Drawing for EOS

USPTO serial 79210501

EOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5645868Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 8, 2019
Examiner
CHADAB, SETH WILLIG
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ralph E. Locher

Ralph E. Locher Lerner Greenberg Stemer LLPPO Box 2480Hollywood, FL 33022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Bakery machines, namely, bread cutting machines; pasta making machines; dough processing machines, namely, dough kneading machines for household purposes; biscuit making machines; [ confectionery making machines; bench presses in the nature of electric fruit presses; ] kneading machines for making pasta for household purposes; electric dough kneading machines for household purposes; electric dough dividing machines; electric dough rounding machines; electric pasta cutting machines; roller tracks for use in belt conveyor apparatus; belt conveyors; machines for cutting strip material; machines for shaping pasta; dough shaping machines; electric shaping machines for pasta; dough sheeting and kneading machinery for household purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Bakers' ovens; installations for baking, namely, baking ovens; cooking tunnels; dough proving apparatus in the nature of dough proofing and retarding units, namely, heating, cooling and humidity controlling units for processing dough; proving cabinets for dough, namely, heating, cooling and humidity controlling units for processing dough; retarding cabinets for dough, namely, heating, cooling and humidity controlling units for processing dough; dough retarding refrigerating apparatus, namely, cooling and humidity controlling units for processing dough; vacuum cooling plants, namely, air cooling apparatus for bakery goods; freezers for bakery goods; cooling apparatus for bakery goodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 25, 2026INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 25, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 3, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2022INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2022INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 2, 2021A7OKAMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Nov 29, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 7, 2021ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 10, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 19, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 8, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 15, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 28, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 19, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 19, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 17, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 28, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 6, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 28, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 30, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 28, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance