Drawing for VIKI

USPTO serial 79211052

VIKI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZIMMERMAN, GAYNNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIKI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Baby carriages; pushchairs; strollers; child safety seat (vehicle); hand cars; baby carriages (covers for-); pucker luggage barrow (terms incomprehensible in the opinion of the International Bureau – Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations); cycle cars; bicycles; electric bicycleSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
020Beds; furniture; cradles; playpens for babies; infant walkers; high chairs for babies; cushions; pillows; baby rocker; frame (terms too vague in the opinion of the International Bureau – Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 8, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 20, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 5, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 20, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 22, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 20, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 13, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 12, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 5, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance