Drawing for TB

USPTO serial 79211106

TB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5461343Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 8, 2018
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Kim

John M. Kim IPLA, LLP4445 Eastgate MallSuite 200San Diego, CA 92121

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Air-conditioning apparatus for industrial purposes; air filters for air conditioners of automobiles; air filters for air conditioning apparatus; air conditioners for vehicles; industrial air purifiers; air conditioning apparatus; water filters; industrial water purifying apparatus; water filtering apparatus; apparatus for filtering drinking water; water purifying apparatus and machines; household tap-water filters, non-electric; electric lamps and lighting apparatus, namely, lighting installations; headlights for automobiles; lights for vehicles, namely, automobiles; lamps for directional signals of automobiles; vehicle dynamo lamps; light bulbs for directional signals for vehicles; lighting apparatus for vehicles; vehicle headlights; incandescent lamp fittings, namely, anti-dazzle devices for vehicles; lights for vehiclesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2026Further Decision Processed by IB—
Oct 29, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 11, 2026XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2026INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2026XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jul 22, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 22, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 8, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 16, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 8, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 20, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 31, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2017UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
Aug 4, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 15, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 15, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 11, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 11, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 10, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 5, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance